Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

[Iain Buclaw]

On 22 December 2012 19:32, Leandro Lucarella <
leandro.lucarella at sociomantic.com> wrote:

> On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 00:42:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> On 12/13/2012 4:17 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
>>
>>> 1. How much work would it be for the guys at Remedy Games to convert
>>> their
>>> codebase from [] to @()?
>>>
>>
>> I don't know. All I know is it's a lot of code.
>>
>
> You should ask. It's really crazy to ask the WHOLE community to take the
> bullet for some company using an experimental unreleased version of the
> compiler without even knowing if there is a good reason why they can't just
> fix their code.
>
> And in any case, this is theirs problem, they should be using a special
> version of the compiler (the one that accepts broken code), not all the
> rest!
>
> This is just completely crazy...
>


This.


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121222/1543d4e5/attachment.html>