About Go, D module naming

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday, December 23, 2012 16:11:02 Walter Bright wrote:
> 6. I'd also throw in getting rid of the "protected" access attribute
> completely, as I've seen debate over that being a useless idea

Really? I'm shocked at that. It's necessary for stuff like NVI if private 
functions aren't virtual as well as any other case where you need to override 
internal functionality in derived classes.

> 7. there's also some debate about what "package" should mean
> 
> I.e. it should be a fairly comprehensive design addressing access, not just
> one aspect of it.

Sounds like a good idea.

- Jonathan M Davis