[xmlp] the recent garbage collector performance improvements
dsimcha
dsimcha at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 1 16:40:20 PST 2012
On Wednesday, 1 February 2012 at 23:43:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Out of curiosity, is there a way to optimize for the "many small
> allocations" case? E.g., if a function allocates, as temporary
> storage,
> a tree with a large number of nodes, which becomes garbage when
> it
> returns. Perhaps a way to sweep the entire space used by the
> tree in one
> go?
>
> Not sure if such a thing is possible.
>
>
> T
My RegionAllocator is probably the best thing for this if the
lifetime is deterministic as you describe. I rewrote the Tree1
benchmark using RegionAllocator a while back just for comparison.
D Tree1 + RegionAllocator had comparable speed to a Java version
of Tree1 run under HotSpot. (About 6 seconds on my box vs. in
the low 30s for Tree1 with the 2.058 GC.)
If all the objects are going to die at the same time but not at a
deterministic time, you could just allocate a big block from the
GC and place class instances in it using emplace().
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list