libphobos.so libdruntime.so

Marco Leise Marco.Leise at gmx.de
Thu Feb 2 19:27:37 PST 2012


Am 03.02.2012, 03:34 Uhr, schrieb H. S. Teoh <hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx>:

> Are there any *good* reasons why druntime and libphobos are not
> dynamically linked? In the long run, we need to support that, since
> otherwise D binaries will be unnecessarily large and the OS won't be
> able to optimize memory usage by sharing library images with multiple
> processes.
>
>
> T

No fear, the people in charge know about all that, it was technical  
reasons that held back the support. That said, there are people who prefer  
static linking. May they speak for themselves...


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list