H. S. Teoh hsteoh at
Thu Feb 2 20:47:28 PST 2012

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:19:37PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Thursday, February 02, 2012 18:34:34 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Are there any *good* reasons why druntime and libphobos are not
> > dynamically linked? In the long run, we need to support that, since
> > otherwise D binaries will be unnecessarily large and the OS won't be
> > able to optimize memory usage by sharing library images with
> > multiple processes.
> Because dmd does not yet support shared libraries on Linux.

Hmph. Since gdc *does* support shared libraries (I think?), it should be
possible, at least in principle, no?


I think Debian's doing something wrong, `apt-get install pesticide',
doesn't seem to remove the bugs on my system! -- Mike Dresser

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list