std.xml and Adam D Ruppe's dom module
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 16:04:10 PST 2012
On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 23:15:50 UTC, Alvaro wrote:
> manipulation code
I'm biased (obviously), but I've never seen a more convenient
way to work with xml. I like my convenience functions a lot.
> I thus suggest, if licensing allows (?
It is Boost licensed, so you can use it (I put the license
at the bottom of my files).
I don't know if it is phobos material, but if there's demand,
maybe I can make that happen.
> A lot of that can be left out in XML.
Right, though you can ignore it too. I sometimes use it
to work with other kinds of xml (web apis sending and receiving),
RSS, and others.
It works well enough for me.
More information about the Digitalmars-d