Message passing between threads: Java 4 times faster than D
doob at me.com
Fri Feb 10 05:59:10 PST 2012
On 2012-02-10 14:54, Oliver Plow wrote:
>>> I wonder how much it helps to just optimize the GC a little. How much
>>> does the performance gap close when you use DMD 2.058 beta instead of
>>> 2.057? This upcoming release has several new garbage collector
>>> optimizations. If the GC is the bottleneck, then it's not surprising
> Is there a way to "turn off" the GC, e.g. a compiler switch to set the heap size to a large number so that the GC is likely not to set in? I searched through this page: http://www.d-programming-language.org/dmd-windows.html#switches But couldn't find anything helpful. Then you could measure the thing with GC "turned off" to see whether the GC is the problem or not.
> -- Oliver
There's a stub implementation of the GC which uses malloc, IIRC. Try
using that one at link time.
More information about the Digitalmars-d