Carmack about static analysis

Walter Bright newshound2 at
Fri Feb 10 10:19:11 PST 2012

On 2/10/2012 3:10 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> Typeless is great when sketching some piece of code, but you'll way more problem
> at the end.

I've heard people say that typeless is just as good, because you load them up 
with unit tests that verify the types. To me, this doesn't seem like any 
advantage. I'd rather have the language automatically check things for me, 
rather than worrying about having complete unit test coverage, let alone the 
bother of writing them.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list