Nick Sabalausky a at a.a
Sun Feb 12 06:27:38 PST 2012

"Daniel Murphy" <yebblies at nospamgmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jh85rp$2rs4$1 at digitalmars.com...
> "Paulo Pinto" <pjmlp at progtools.org> wrote in message 
> news:jh7v08$2chs$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> If you remove all of that then how good would D- be in regard with 
>> existing languages being used for the same tasks?
> You still have all of D's compile-time magic, which I miss every time I 
> need to do embedded programming.  You still have the simple syntax 
> improvement. I would love to be able to do away with the preprocessor and 
> stupidly_long_method_names_because_of_no_overloading_or_method_syntax.

Plus a module system that's actually sane.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list