Programming for std.log

Jose Armando Garcia jsancio at
Sun Feb 12 14:43:33 PST 2012

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:32 PM, David Nadlinger <see at> wrote:
> On 2/12/12 11:22 PM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
>> Sorry for the false alarm. I think the problem went away once I
>> rebuild dmd, druntime and phobos. Your advice was really good in
>> helping me make any sense of this! Thanks.
>> -Jose
> So std.log is still/again ready for review?

Yep! It should be. I am fixing some minor things now. Will do some
final testing in Windows. Don't foresee any problems there. I will
send you an email in a bit. Either way I think it should be ready for
review by tomorrow!

> std.log has been in the queue forever (but was previously postponed due to
> Jose being unavailable), std.uuid is small (but parts of it depend on
> not-yet-in-Phobos hashing code), and Jacob Carlborg is waiting for feedback
> on Orange – no clear winner, but to finally get the process running again,
> I'd suggest to begin the std.log review tomorrow. Since nobody else stepped
> up, I'd volunteer as review manager.
> David

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list