Review of Jose Armando Garcia Sancio's std.log

Jose Armando Garcia jsancio at
Tue Feb 14 09:03:26 PST 2012

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:50 PM, David Nadlinger <see at> wrote:
> There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to get things
> going, I have volunteered to manage the review of Jose's std.log proposal.
> Barring any objections, the review period starts now and ends in three
> weeks, on March 6th, followed by a week of voting.
> ---
> Code:

It is better if we use this:
That link will stay up to date as I make changes to the code.

> Docs:
> Known remaining issues:
>  - Proof-reading of the docs is required.
>  - Not yet fully tested on Windows.
> Depends on:
> (will be part of 2.058)
> ---
> Earlier drafts of this library were discussed last year, just search the NG
> and ML archives for "std.log".
> I think getting this right is vitally important so that we can avoid an
> abundance of partly incompatible logging libraries like in Java. Thus, I'd
> warmly encourage everyone to actively try out the module or compare it with
> any logging solution you might already be using in your project.
> Please post all feedback in this thread, and remember: Although
> comprehensive reviews are obviously appreciated, short comments are very
> welcome as well!
> David

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list