Review of Jose Armando Garcia Sancio's std.log
so at so.so
Tue Feb 14 09:48:05 PST 2012
On Tuesday, 14 February 2012 at 16:21:42 UTC, Jose Armando Garcia
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:42 AM, jdrewsen <jdrewsen at nospam.com>
>> On Tuesday, 14 February 2012 at 02:28:11 UTC, Jose Armando
>> Garcia wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM, jdrewsen
>>> <jdrewsen at nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> A first quick observation:
>>>> I vote for a debug severity level. Then make that default to
>>>> the template
>>>> parameter for log:
>>>> template log(Severity severity = Severity.debug)
>>>> That would make it nice for good old print debugging.
>>>> log("This is a dbg message");
>>> I like the idea of having a default. Not sure about adding
>>> debug. What
>>> are you trying to do with default that log!info and vlog(#)
>>> let you do?
>> As Sean mentioned the vlog function may be the one I want.
>> Maybe it is okey
>> not to have a debug severity but then a default on the vlog
>> level parameter
>> would be nice. That would make quick debug prints a tad simpler
> If we do set a default what should it be? It is not clear to me
> value we should pick so if you have any suggestions let me know.
IMO a default severity level is not a good idea, not explicit to
As i suggested on another reply, getting rid of the
instantiations solve it.
We lose nothing and gain a common keyword. I used to have
severity levels for my logging library in c++. As soon as i got
the C++0x options i thrashed them all.
Now instead of:
txt(error) << "this is: " << it;
i just got:
error("this is: ", it);
Win win for every aspect of it. And got rid of the keyword "txt".
More information about the Digitalmars-d