Object.opEquals, opCmp, toHash

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 05:58:36 PST 2012

Le 16/02/2012 12:12, Daniel Murphy a écrit :
> I mean, are we going to have a shared overload in Object for each of those
> functions?

I'd argue that in some cases, the sompiler should be able to generate a 
shared const function automatically from the const function. This has 
some limitation. I'm currently writting an article about that 
possibility and what are the limitations.

BTW, shared is - sadly - almost a stub right now, so it doesn't really 

> "Walter Bright"<newshound2 at digitalmars.com>  wrote in message
> news:jhikus$227j$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> On 2/16/2012 1:30 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>>> What about shared?
>> No! Shared is a special animal, and the user will still have to take care
>> to deal with synchronization issues.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list