gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 08:54:06 PST 2012
If i recall correctly this is the third thread that ended with "we
need a D front-end".
Making a good front-end will mean a very significant step forward
towards a good support from infrastructure.
Having D supported everywhere with advanced features like semantic
text coloring will definitely say "YES" to "Do I wanna use D?"
question of newcomers.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Murphy <yebblies at nospamgmail.com> wrote:
> "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx> wrote in message
> news:mailman.667.1329753569.20196.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>> I've suggested before, and would suggest it again, that it would be nice
>> if dmd had an option, or came with another standalone tool, that can
>> display the fully-expanded type of something, as the compiler would have
>> understood it. For example:
> This sounds like dmd's json output, but even less implemented and requiring
> repeated lexing/parsing/semantic.
> It would make a lot more sense with the compiler as a library.
More information about the Digitalmars-d