james at aatch.net
Mon Feb 20 12:23:35 PST 2012
On 21 February 2012 09:02, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:
> On 2012-02-20 17:17, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> "H. S. Teoh"<hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx> wrote in message
>> news:mailman.667.1329753569.20196.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>>> I've suggested before, and would suggest it again, that it would be nice
>>> if dmd had an option, or came with another standalone tool, that can
>>> display the fully-expanded type of something, as the compiler would have
>>> understood it. For example:
>> This sounds like dmd's json output, but even less implemented and
>> repeated lexing/parsing/semantic.
>> It would make a lot more sense with the compiler as a library.
> Exactly. We basically need Clang for D, preferably written in D.
> /Jacob Carlborg
libclang is awesome, so libdmd should be /more/ awesome, right?
More information about the Digitalmars-d