size_t + ptrdiff_t

[Stewart Gordon]

On 20/02/2012 19:11, Johannes Pfau wrote:
<snip>
> Exactly what's written there, c_long and c_ulong always match the C
> long/ulong types, whatever size those may be. It's mostly (only?)
> useful for C bindings.

So in other words, it just means whatever somebody has decreed that the "long" keyword in 
C shall mean on that platform.

When did C gain a type called ulong, anyway?

Are we going to have c_long_long as well?

Stewart.