size_t + ptrdiff_t
smjg_1998 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 21 14:11:16 PST 2012
On 20/02/2012 19:11, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Exactly what's written there, c_long and c_ulong always match the C
> long/ulong types, whatever size those may be. It's mostly (only?)
> useful for C bindings.
So in other words, it just means whatever somebody has decreed that the "long" keyword in
C shall mean on that platform.
When did C gain a type called ulong, anyway?
Are we going to have c_long_long as well?
More information about the Digitalmars-d