size_t + ptrdiff_t
smjg_1998 at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 22 07:16:41 PST 2012
On 22/02/2012 07:24, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-02-22 06:24, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 2/21/2012 2:11 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
>>> Are we going to have c_long_long as well?
> Wouldn't that always be a "long" in D? Or is it the same as with "long" in C.
long in D is 64 bits.
long in C is 32 bits (on Win16/32 at least).
If the C standard sets in stone the size of a long long, then we can do away with a
c_long_long and just use long. Otherwise, if we're going to have c_int and c_long, it
only makes sense to have c_long_long as well.
More information about the Digitalmars-d