dmd -c behaviour doesn't take account of packages.
b.helyer at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 14:33:57 PST 2012
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> Then what happens when you have
> dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
> Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with
> the object file
> names to try and avoid collisions.
Well, the thing is in this case everything is being passed to the
compiler. It knows the names of everything. But yeah, I think
complaining is fine _if_ dmd allows individual modules to be
named explicitly. Otherwise, all in one is good. But really, even
prefixing it would be better than what we have now. What about
'module.foo_a.o' if foo_a isn't in a package?
More information about the Digitalmars-d