dmd -c behaviour doesn't take account of packages.

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-02-22 23:33, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> Then what happens when you have
>>
>> dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
>>
>
> Good point.
>
>>
>> Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with the
>> object file
>> names to try and avoid collisions.
>
> Well, the thing is in this case everything is being passed to the
> compiler. It knows the names of everything. But yeah, I think
> complaining is fine _if_ dmd allows individual modules to be named
> explicitly. Otherwise, all in one is good. But really, even prefixing it
> would be better than what we have now. What about 'module.foo_a.o' if
> foo_a isn't in a package?

See my reply to Jonathan:

http://forum.dlang.org/thread/svyqjflmabsxabmnpzrg@forum.dlang.org?page=2#post-ji56kf:242j8p:241:40digitalmars.com

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg