dmd -c behaviour doesn't take account of packages.
b.helyer at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 15:06:55 PST 2012
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 21:28:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2012-02-23 00:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> >On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
>> >>Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it all
>> >>at once.
>> >Then maybe there _should_ be a flag to tell it to
>> >use/generate the
>> >appropriate directory structure. You already typically give
>> >it an
>> >output directory. It wouldn't be all that hard for it to then
>> >generate and use the correct directories in that directory.
>> >still bugs me a little, because that's more of a build tool's
>> >but it wouldn't be hard to do, would fix the file conflicts
>> >modules, and would let you keep that extra speed.
>> >- Jonathan M Davis
>> I don't see a point in putting the object files in different
>> directories when the compiler can output the object files with
>> qualified module names.
> Because ambiguity can arise. Like
> my/module/A.d -> my_module_A.o
> my_module_A.d -> my_module_A.o (conflict)
> my_module/A.d -> my_module_A.o (conflict)
> my/module_A.d -> my_module_A.o (conflict)
> Granted, this is a really contrived example, but unexpected
> like that do happen.
Did you not read what Jacob posted?
More information about the Digitalmars-d