Conclusions of the exception discussion
kevincox.ca at gmail.com
Sat Feb 25 04:29:01 PST 2012
I think there should also be multiple catches so that you can deal with
different exceptions different ways without trying to upcast them over and
On Feb 25, 2012 1:30 AM, "Daniel Murphy" <yebblies at nospamgmail.com> wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.93.1330149312.24984.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
> > However, regardless of which we choose, someone is going to have to take
> > the
> > time to implement it, since odds are that Walter isn't going to do it.
> > whether we end up with a feature along these lines is highly dependent on
> > whether anyone is willing to take the time to implement it and get it
> > accepted
> > by Walter.
> Waaaay ahead of you here.
> It's currently 'catch(auto e : E1, E2, E3)' but changing the syntax is
> trivial if everyone decides they want it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Digitalmars-d