Conclusions of the exception discussion

[Daniel Murphy]

Could you give a code example of what you mean?  You can still use multiple catch blocks perfectly well with this patch.
  "Kevin Cox" <kevincox.ca at gmail.com> wrote in message news:mailman.97.1330172953.24984.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
  I think there should also be multiple catches so that you can deal with different exceptions different ways without trying to upcast them over and over again.

  On Feb 25, 2012 1:30 AM, "Daniel Murphy" <yebblies at nospamgmail.com> wrote:

    "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message
    news:mailman.93.1330149312.24984.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
    > However, regardless of which we choose, someone is going to have to take
    > the
    > time to implement it, since odds are that Walter isn't going to do it. So,
    > whether we end up with a feature along these lines is highly dependent on
    > whether anyone is willing to take the time to implement it and get it
    > accepted
    > by Walter.

    Waaaay ahead of you here.

    https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/738

    It's currently 'catch(auto e : E1, E2, E3)' but changing the syntax is
    trivial if everyone decides they want it.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120226/7b627d6c/attachment.html>