John Carmack applauds D's pure attribute
H. S. Teoh
hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx
Sat Feb 25 11:05:14 PST 2012
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:45:34PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Yao Gomez" <yao.gomez at gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:pdyvfpeaigfvorkfnddi at forum.dlang.org...
> > On Saturday, 25 February 2012 at 16:08:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> "Trass3r" <un at known.com> wrote in message
> >> news:op.v98sager3ncmek at enigma...
> >>> http://twitter.com/#!/ID_AA_Carmack/status/173111220092682240
> >> It's not showing the actual quote, can someone paste it?
> > Anyways, here's the quote:
> >> Using D for my daily work is not an option, but I applaud thier
> >> inclusion of a "pure" attribute.
> Interesting. I wish he'd elaborate on why it's not an option for his
> daily work.
I can't speak for him, but it could be employer resistance, or perhaps
the current volatile state of D. But this is just a wild guess.
To provoke is to call someone stupid; to argue is to call each other stupid.
More information about the Digitalmars-d