John Carmack applauds D's pure attribute

Paulo Pinto pjmlp at progtools.org
Sat Feb 25 11:26:43 PST 2012


Am 25.02.2012 20:05, schrieb H. S. Teoh:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:45:34PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Yao Gomez"<yao.gomez at gmail.com>  wrote in message
>> news:pdyvfpeaigfvorkfnddi at forum.dlang.org...
>>> On Saturday, 25 February 2012 at 16:08:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>>> "Trass3r"<un at known.com>  wrote in message
>>>> news:op.v98sager3ncmek at enigma...
>>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/ID_AA_Carmack/status/173111220092682240
>>>>
>>>> It's not showing the actual quote, can someone paste it?
>>>
>>> It works for me. God bless Javascript.
>>>
>>> Anyways, here's the quote:
>>>
>>>> Using D for my daily work is not an option, but I applaud thier
>>>> inclusion of a "pure" attribute.
>>
>> Interesting. I wish he'd elaborate on why it's not an option for his
>> daily work.
> [...]
>
> I can't speak for him, but it could be employer resistance, or perhaps
> the current volatile state of D. But this is just a wild guess.
>
>
> T
>


Most likely because D tooling is still not up to speed with what C and 
C++ provide.

Not to forget that all the Console SDK and constraints one has on the 
approvals.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list