Inheritance of purity

[deadalnix]

Le 26/02/2012 00:25, so a écrit :
> On Friday, 24 February 2012 at 00:01:52 UTC, F i L wrote:
>
>> Well then I disagree with Walter on this as well. What's wrong with
>> having a "standard" toolset in the same way you have standard
>> libraries? It's unrealistic to think people (at large) will be writing
>> any sort of serious application outside of a modern IDE. I'm not
>> saying it's Walters job to write IDE integration, only that the
>> language design shouldn't cater to the smaller use-case scenario.
>>
>> Cleaner code is easier to read and, within an IDE with tooltips, makes
>> little difference when looking at the hierarchy. If you want to be
>> hard-core about it, no one is stopping you from explicitly qualifying
>> each definition.
>
> Debugger is the single tool in VisualStudio that i failed to replace in
> unix land.
> I have tried many of them and they all sucked. They are either
> incomplete or crash too often. Command line gdb is not much of an
> option. The situation is so bad that looks like i need to go back to the
> VisualC++/gvim combo.

You have GUI that goes over gdb and are nice to use.