package and virtual
doob at me.com
Wed Feb 29 23:26:00 PST 2012
On 2012-03-01 01:53, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> package functions are currenly non-virtual.
> The spec claims that "all non-static non-private non-template member func
> tions are virtual," which would mean that package is supposed to be virtual.
> But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual. So, is
> that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package going to be
> made virtual at some point?
> - Jonathan M Davis
Is anyone even using "package"? I've basically never used it.
More information about the Digitalmars-d