Database developer's gentle view on D.

bls bizprac at orange.fr
Mon Jan 2 08:32:18 PST 2012


On 01/01/2012 07:02 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800, bls wrote:
>
>>      Not yet available. In case that Steve Teale (and he did a dammed
>> good Job, as well as Piotr) will add std.database this will not change
>> the situation significantly. 'Cause std.database will contain just
>> rudimentary DB support..  A Database independent, ORM based library
>> module is not even matter of discussion. That's a  pity.
>>
>>
> Bjoern,
>
> Even being retired does not mean there's nothing else to do but D library
> components. I didn't get back to you yet because I'm busy making
> furniture for our expanding little enterprise here, and because of the
> holidays, and because I need to lose a few kilos off the belly that
> magically appeared while I was doing nothing but sit in front of a
> keyboard.
>
> Also I'd say for rudimentary I'd want to say basic. There's a slight
> difference.
>
> I'll be back.
>
> Steve
>
> But don't put the database stuff
>

Hi Steve,
first of all: A happy and successful new year to you!

What makes me a bit nervous is the use of structures in your source.
In case that your goal is to establish a D database access standard, 
client and server wise, Interfaces are the way to go.

Well, isn't  the right of the youth to be impatient :) (I am just 50)

So I am waiting for your feedback regarding the link I've send you. In 
my (in this case not so humble opinion) following this Design would make 
much sense.
Kind regards, Bjoern


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list