The God Language

[Timon Gehr]

On 01/02/2012 09:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "maarten van damme"<maartenvd1994 at gmail.com>  wrote in message
> news:mailman.1985.1325157846.24802.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>> I think it would be an object oriented language, I'm a believer in the
>> string theory :)
>
> I heard on the Science Channel that M-theory was becoming favored over
> string therory. (Not that I would actually know.)
>
>> I have actually thought of the whole universe as one big simulation, would
>> really explain how light waves without medium (like a math function).
>>
>
> I came across a book one time that talked about the 'verse basically being
> one big quantum computer. I didn't actually red through it though, and I
> can't remember what it was called... :(
>
>> If I were god I would def use object oriented because it makes for easy
>> describing of different particles and strings. and I'm pretty sure there
>> is
>> no garbage collector included in gods language :p
>>
>
> If I were god, then I'd presumably be omnipotent, and if I were omnipotent,
> then I'd be able to do it all in something like FuckFuck, or that
> shakesperian language, or that lolcat language without any difficulty. And I
> could just fix any limitations in the implementation. So that would seem the
> best option :)
>
>

God cannot be omnipotent. If he was, he could invent a task he cannot solve.