SIMD support...
Manu
turkeyman at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 11:06:42 PST 2012
On 6 January 2012 20:25, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> How is making __v128 a builtin type better than defining it as:
>
> align(16) struct __v128
> {
> ubyte[16] data;
> }
>
Where in that code is the compiler informed that your structure should
occupy a SIMD registers, and apply SIMD ABI conventions?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120106/e2fea51d/attachment.html>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list