SIMD support...

[Manu]

On 6 January 2012 20:25, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:

> How is making __v128 a builtin type better than defining it as:
>
> align(16) struct __v128
> {
>    ubyte[16] data;
> }
>

Where in that code is the compiler informed that your structure should
occupy a SIMD registers, and apply SIMD ABI conventions?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120106/e2fea51d/attachment.html>