On 1/8/2012 12:35 PM, Trass3r wrote: >> Clang is a lot slower at compiling than dmc. > > With or without optimizations? http://biolpc22.york.ac.uk/wx/wxhatch/wxMSW_Compiler_choice.html > Would be interesting to see detailed comparisons lexing/parsing/... like > http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html Being faster than gcc isn't a great trick.