Discussion about D at a C++ forum

[Brad Roberts]

On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> On Monday, January 09, 2012 11:37:50 Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 1/9/2012 10:59 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > > I suspect that part of the problem is that Wikipedia lists D as
> > > appearing in 1999. And, of course, since D2 didn't start until 2007,
> > > saying that D has been around since 1999 easily gives the mistaken
> > > impression that we're doing a bad job, since D _still_ isn't complete
> > > and fully stable.
> > 
> > Please fix the wikipedia entry!
> 
> With what? Make it say 2003 for D1 and 2007 for D2?
> 
> - Jonathan M Davis

All of the above.  More information there is better than trying to pick a 
tiny part of it.