start on SIMD documentation

Manu turkeyman at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 14:37:52 PST 2012


On 14 January 2012 00:31, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
> wrote:

> On 1/13/12 2:41 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> On 1/13/2012 12:27 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/01/12 8:02 PM, Mehrdad wrote:
>>>
>>>> Er... is there any reason why we're using such a cryptic PXOR value
>>>> instead of operator overloading?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I imagine Walter will add the operator overloads later.
>>>
>>
>> Right. simd() is just the bottom layer building block. It's a compiler
>> intrinsic, and I don't want to make every overload a compiler intrinsic.
>>
>
> People will want to pass a variable for op. Would that work?


...I really don't think they will.
and most people would never dive this deep if the standard lib does its job
properly.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120114/dbf402c1/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list