Call site 'ref'

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Sun Jan 15 16:38:42 PST 2012


On 01/16/2012 01:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/15/12 6:30 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>> On 15/01/12 11:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 16, 2012 00:41:14 Timon Gehr wrote:
>>>> Well, struct literals are lvalues, at least in DMD.
>>>
>>> Yeah. I don't understand that. I've argued about it with Walter before.
>>> Apparently they are in C++ as well. I don't understand it. It makes it
>>> so that
>>
>> In C++, struct literals are rvalues. C++ just has a special rule that
>> const references can bind to rvalues (but non-const references cannot),
>
> That's a bad rule that we shouldn't copy.
>
> Andrei

What do you think is an optimal rule regarding struct 
literals/lvalues/rvalues and ref parameters?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list