Call site 'ref'

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 1/15/12 6:38 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 01/16/2012 01:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 1/15/12 6:30 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>>> On 15/01/12 11:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>> On Monday, January 16, 2012 00:41:14 Timon Gehr wrote:
>>>>> Well, struct literals are lvalues, at least in DMD.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. I don't understand that. I've argued about it with Walter before.
>>>> Apparently they are in C++ as well. I don't understand it. It makes it
>>>> so that
>>>
>>> In C++, struct literals are rvalues. C++ just has a special rule that
>>> const references can bind to rvalues (but non-const references cannot),
>>
>> That's a bad rule that we shouldn't copy.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> What do you think is an optimal rule regarding struct
> literals/lvalues/rvalues and ref parameters?

auto ref

Andrei