Call site 'ref'

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Sun Jan 15 17:21:24 PST 2012


On 01/16/2012 02:00 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/15/12 6:38 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 01/16/2012 01:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 1/15/12 6:30 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>>>> On 15/01/12 11:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, January 16, 2012 00:41:14 Timon Gehr wrote:
>>>>>> Well, struct literals are lvalues, at least in DMD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. I don't understand that. I've argued about it with Walter
>>>>> before.
>>>>> Apparently they are in C++ as well. I don't understand it. It makes it
>>>>> so that
>>>>
>>>> In C++, struct literals are rvalues. C++ just has a special rule that
>>>> const references can bind to rvalues (but non-const references cannot),
>>>
>>> That's a bad rule that we shouldn't copy.
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> What do you think is an optimal rule regarding struct
>> literals/lvalues/rvalues and ref parameters?
>
> auto ref
>
> Andrei

But that only works for templates?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list