Apparently unsigned types really are necessary

[bcs]

On 01/22/2012 01:42 AM, Mail Mantis wrote:
> 2012/1/22 Walter Bright<newshound2 at digitalmars.com>:
>> http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3495283
>>
>> and getting rid of unsigned types is not the solution to signed/unsigned
>> issues.
>
> Would it be sane to add integer overflow/carry runtime checks in
> -debug builds? This could probably solve such issues, but we'd need
> some means to avoid this checks when nesessary.

http://embed.cs.utah.edu/ioc/