typedef, why did it go? Is there anything instead?

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Jan 23 10:08:50 PST 2012


On 1/23/2012 5:08 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Walter, what are your views on emitting the names of aliased types to debug?

I don't really have an opinion on it, except that generally when I'm debugging 
I'm interested in what a type really is, not the layer over it.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list