typedef, why did it go? Is there anything instead?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Monday, January 23, 2012 10:08:50 Walter Bright wrote:
> On 1/23/2012 5:08 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > Walter, what are your views on emitting the names of aliased types to
> > debug?
> I don't really have an opinion on it, except that generally when I'm
> debugging I'm interested in what a type really is, not the layer over it.

I usually want the aliased type. I can look up what the alias is, but I can't 
know that something is using an alias if the alias is gone.

- Jonathan M Davis