D for the web?
Marco Leise
Marco.Leise at gmx.de
Tue Jan 24 04:51:12 PST 2012
Am 24.01.2012, 03:43 Uhr, schrieb Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a>:
> "Tobias Pankrath" <tobias at pankrath.net> wrote in message
> news:jfkn05$h2n$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>>> Am I the only one who thinks this sounds like a horrible idea? :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's horrible, but not as horrible as using straight JavaScript (or
>>> CoffeeScript, IMO).
>>>
>>> It's a necessary evil thanks to JavaScript's underserved ubiquity.
>>
>> Google Web Toolkit works quite well.
>
> I'd have a hard time trusting it. Would the resulting code necessarily
> use
> Ajax even if I didn't want it to? How much JS overhead does it pull in
> for
> simple uses of JS? Does the resulting code automatically interact with
> Google's servers in any way? How compatible is the resulting JS? Would
> the
> resulting code break the page when JS is off? It's Google, for god's
> sake,
> can they even be trusted at all? Etc.
Trust is not enough, you must love the big brother.</brainwash>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list