automated C++ binding generation.. Booost D, NO , Not us. SIMD is more important.
Kagamin
spam at here.lot
Fri Jan 27 10:38:40 PST 2012
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 18:01:48 UTC, Zachary Lund wrote:
> I do not mind using a C library in D because of how straight
> forward it is. But simply mentioning C++ in D seems to add
> unneeded complexity which should be avoided. I think the answer
> to a question such as "What's the alternative to Qt in D?"
> should not be "Qt bindings" but maybe a library which imitates
> the implementation and/or interface of Qt UI widgets in native
> D.
http://www.ohloh.net/p/qt/estimated_cost
some scary numbers
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list