automated C++ binding generation.. Booost D, NO , Not us. SIMD is more important.

Piotr Szturmaj bncrbme at jadamspam.pl
Fri Jan 27 11:28:09 PST 2012


Kagamin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 18:01:48 UTC, Zachary Lund wrote:
>> I do not mind using a C library in D because of how straight forward
>> it is. But simply mentioning C++ in D seems to add unneeded complexity
>> which should be avoided. I think the answer to a question such as
>> "What's the alternative to Qt in D?" should not be "Qt bindings" but
>> maybe a library which imitates the implementation and/or interface of
>> Qt UI widgets in native D.
>
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/qt/estimated_cost
> some scary numbers

$300K for build scripts... and Mozilla paid almost 3 million for the same.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list