state of the pull autotester

Daniel Murphy yebblies at nospamgmail.com
Sun Jan 29 22:13:22 PST 2012


"Brad Roberts" <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.182.1327902075.25230.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
> Yes.  It's a way for request to be prioritized higher.  A pull that's 
> receiving comments is much more likely to be
> pulled than one that isn't, so might as well test it sooner.

Makes sense.

The pull tester is amazing, by the way.  It makes life a lot easier.  If 
anyone's wondering what to get my for my birthday, one of those machines 
that runs the phobos tests in 1:42 would be great. 




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list