state of the pull autotester
Daniel Murphy
yebblies at nospamgmail.com
Sun Jan 29 22:13:22 PST 2012
"Brad Roberts" <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.182.1327902075.25230.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
> Yes. It's a way for request to be prioritized higher. A pull that's
> receiving comments is much more likely to be
> pulled than one that isn't, so might as well test it sooner.
Makes sense.
The pull tester is amazing, by the way. It makes life a lot easier. If
anyone's wondering what to get my for my birthday, one of those machines
that runs the phobos tests in 1:42 would be great.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list