Proposal: takeFront and takeBack

[Roman D. Boiko]

On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 07:40:55 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> I'll propose "spendFront", which is pretty much the same thing, 
> but is less loaded. I'm not entirely sure if it carries the 
> meaning as well? I think it is a worth discussion.

I'm not a native speaker, but I feel that "spend" would be a 
wrong choice.

fetchFront was proposed by Dmitry, which I like more than 
spendFront, but slightly less than consumeFront.

By the way, I don't have any associations from the above. Consume 
is widely used in everyday life, and it should not be a problem 
that there are various uses.

As for introducing a new concept, it looks like that would be 
necessary any way, because existing concepts correspond to 
something different :) For example, that was my original 
motivation to vote against takeFront.