LLVM IR influence on compiler debugging
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Sat Jul 7 03:45:17 PDT 2012
On 2012-07-07 01:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
> My guess is that, unless something changes significantly, DMD will
> remain a niche tool; useful as a reference/research compiler, but for
> actual work people will use LDC or GDC.
One think I really like about DMD is that is really fast at compiling.
It's also a lot faster to compile DMD and LDC/GDC, especially if you
need to compile the backends.
> At the moment, the ONLY reasons I use DMD are to test my changes to the
> compiler and that LLVM doesn't yet support SEH. As soon as LDC supports
> SEH, and it will (I hear 3.2 will), I will move all my work to LDC. So
> what if it's a version or two behind, it has superior code generation
> and better Windows support (COFF/x64 anybody?).
That is being worked on:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/2511126cd7a234797e8b32515e419ce4f84ca928
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list