Let's stop parser Hell

[Roman D. Boiko]

On Saturday, 7 July 2012 at 19:29:47 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> Another idea that I've never realized is to add operator 
> precedence grammar to pegged. Of course it should fit naturally 
> with traditional PEG, for instance taking responsibility for 
> parsing expressions.

But that's already available by explicitly defining expression 
grammar via nested rules. See for example the examples/dgrammar.d 
in Pegged. This way, for example, multiplication has precedence 
over addition. (It looks like I misunderstood you. Did I?)