All right, all right! Interim decision regarding qualified Object methods

Tobias Pankrath tobias at pankrath.net
Thu Jul 12 04:50:00 PDT 2012


> Another weapon to attack the problem is introducing in the DMD 
> back-end an optimization (already present in LLVM, but I think 
> not used on default), merging of functions with the same body 
> (leaving just a jump as the body of the removed function, to 
> keep their function pointers distinct).

Why not drop that requirement? What is the use case of different 
function pointers for different but equivalent functions? Does 
anyone depend on this?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list