All right, all right! Interim decision regarding qualified Object methods

[Mehrdad]

On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 03:57:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:51:22 -0400, Mehrdad 
> <wfunction at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 02:19:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
>> wrote:
>>> That raises an interesting point. With these changes, what 
>>> should opEquals' signature be for classes?
>>
>> How about inout?
>
> No.  opEquals returns bool.
>
> -Steve

I meant more like

bool opEquals(inout Object other) inout;