D versionning
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Jul 15 23:07:16 PDT 2012
On 7/15/2012 4:53 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On 16/07/2012 01:07, Walter Bright wrote:
>> It needs to stop completely.
>>
>
> No. It hasn't been made for no reasons.
>
> But yes, some code is broken in the process. This is exactly why we need a more
> sophisticated versionning process (note the recurring pattern in my posts :D ).
>
> The fact that some people have legacy code shouldn't stop D progress. But with
> the current system, D must either break code or make no progress.
Changing names is minute progress, and is too costly in terms of annoying
existing users and breaking their code.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list