getNext

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 16 14:55:34 PDT 2012


On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:48:05 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu  
<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:


> Consider this:
>
> T* getNext(R, T)(ref R range, ref T item);

I see you still defending this concept from 2010, does it mean we may  
still get it? (it would make things easier for std.io for sure)

If so, can we ditch the notion of forward+ ranges requiring save?

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list