D versionning
RivenTheMage
riven-mage at id.ru
Mon Jul 16 21:37:23 PDT 2012
On Monday, 16 July 2012 at 22:14:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Going to v3 would mean incrementing the 2.
> We have _no_ intention of doing that for years
> to come.
Small steps are perfect for many projects, but - in my opinion -
not for a programming language specification (and reference
implementation). Big leaps are better.
Look at C# - 2.0, 3.0, 4.0...
I'm aware of counterexamples (like PHP), but these are bad
examples to follow.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list